x
Loading
+ -
Mouth Matters. (01/2025)

Our ever-shrinking chops.

Text: Noëmi Kern

Can sex be determined from the size of the jawbone and teeth? And how are human teeth evolving? Answers from the field of anthropology.

Collage of futuristically dressed people with jawbones and teeth from archaeological finds
(Collage: SUAN Conceptual Design GmbH)

When bone fragments and teeth are uncovered during an archaeological dig, the ancient DNA (aDNA) can be analyzed to help determine the sex of the deceased person. Previously, anthropologists would figure out biological sex based on the shape of certain bones and the size of the bones and teeth. Male vertebrates are usually larger than their female counterparts. The flaws of this approach have been illustrated by cases such as the “Red Lady of Paviland.” When the diminutive skeleton was discovered in 1823, it was initially classified as female. Doubts were raised early on, and aDNA analyses in the 2000s definitively confirmed that those doubts were justified: The Red Lady was a man.

Caution must be exercised when equating size with sex. This was highlighted by a study in which an international team — including researchers in integrative prehistory and archaeological Science (IPAS) at the University of Basel — investigated how tooth and jaw size are linked to biological sex and body size.

A large mouth doesn’t mean a male.

The researchers took dental impressions from 100 Central European students — 50 men and 50 women — at an Austrian university and ran statistical analyses. They explored the extent to which differences in tooth and jaw size can be explained by body size and sex. They concluded that the primary factor in a person’s tooth and jaw size isn’t their sex, but the size of their body.

Accordingly, if a large jawbone is found during a dig, it will normally come from a person with a larger frame. It would be false, however, to assume that the person is male. “The pelvic bone is the only bone whose dimensions are a somewhat reliable indicator of biological sex,” explains Werner Vach, the IPAS research associate in charge of statistical analysis. According to Vach, this study was the first to explore the possible connection between tooth and jaw size and sex in such a systematic approach.

Nevertheless, some sex-specific differences were discovered between the impressions taken from the male and female participants. The jawbone showed a greater correlation between measurements and sex. “It influences facial proportions, and sex effects play a larger role — not just in terms of biological sex, but also social sex. We classify a prominent chin as male, while a narrower chin appears female,” says Vach. In forensic analyses, the jaw could therefore be a more precise indicator of biological sex than the teeth. Only the canine teeth show more significant differences: They were around 30 percent larger in the men, while the rest of the teeth differed only by around 10 percent.

Form follows function.

“Evolution follows the principle of form follows function. Meat-eating creatures developed a different set of teeth to plant-eaters. The same goes for the gastrointestinal tract,” explains Kurt W. Alt, who specializes in dental anthropology and analyzes teeth to draw conclusions about modern and historical populations.

The human diet has changed significantly over time. The discovery of fire around two million years ago proved to be a turning point: Food could be heated, and the cooking process made it softer. Around 14,000 years ago, sedentism also changed the food that humans could access. They stopped living mainly off hunted animals, berries, mushrooms and roots, and began to cultivate crops and keep livestock.

Density stress in the jaw.

These major cultural changes have influenced the evolution of the teeth and jaw, which have become smaller over time — although not simultaneously. “There is limited overlap between the development of the jaw and teeth,” says Alt. This also leads to difficulties. A contemporary adult has between 28 and 32 teeth, depending on whether they still have (or never even developed) their wisdom teeth. For 70 to 80 percent of people, they have either never had their third molars or have had them removed for health reasons. “Because the jaw has evolved to be smaller, there often isn’t enough space for all the teeth. Accordingly, the oral cavity has also shrunk, which today contributes to sleep apnea,” he says.

Our teeth are yet to adapt to modern, mostly soft, food. The teeth are formed and sized to grind up much harder consistencies than are often required. “If we follow a diet filled with convenience products, we chew a lot less than our ancestors needed to. We could get by with fewer teeth,” says Alt.

He therefore expects that our teeth and jaws will continue to shrink in the future. In fact, we may not even develop some of the teeth we have today — as we’re already seeing with wisdom teeth. This trend has been observed for decades. Alt talks of a “microevolution in the background.” Statistician Vach waxes philosophical: “Changes like these aren’t bad in themselves. Vampire-like fangs don’t make sense if we don’t need them.”

Kurt W. Alt has been a guest professor in IPAS at the University of Basel since 2014. He started out in oral medicine before going on to study anthropology, ethnology and archaeology.

Werner Vach has been an external lecturer in archaeological statistics at the Faculty of Science, University of Basel since 2018. He is an expert in the statistical analysis of archaeological and anthropological datasets.

Sources published in Biology (2024), doi: 10.3390/biology13080569


More articles in this issue of UNI NOVA (May 2025).

To top